On 19th November, Hitwise reported that Facebook received 25 percent of all page views in the US. That’s 5 times the page views that Google received. Hitwise also logged Facebook as receiving 3 percent more web visits than the search giant. And this all excludes mobile traffic.

And while Hitwise’s competitor, comScore, still has Facebook trailing the search giant at 151.13 million U.S. uniques in October compared to Google’s 173.3 million, they also peg Facebook as a leader where it counts. Just 2 weeks ago comScore reported that more than 23% of all US online display ads in September appeared on Facebook. That’s more than twice as many as any other publisher and nearly 9 times Google’s share of only 2.7 percent of online ad displays.

So just what exactly is happening here? How is Facebook catching up to Google so quickly? Well, it has a lot to do with human nature.

1.Human Nature and Digital Media

Facebook’s edge over Google is based in the fact that it facilitates natural human behavior. Google, on the other hand, is merely a band aid solution to a temporary problem.

You see, Google offers a solution to an artificial problem — namely, how to sift through the vast quantities of information on a system that’s man-made and arbitrarily designed. Facebook, however, offers a way to take available technology, adapt it to natural human behavior (ingrained over 3 million years of evolution), and enhance that behavior.

2.Facebook doesn’t need the web, Google does

This is why Americans spend 906 million hours a month inside of social networks, but only 138 million hours a month searching (Ad Age Article). Human beings are inherently socially creatures, so any utility or media or app that can complement or enhance our social experience is going to prove incredibly popular (at least until new technology finds a better way to enhance that experience).

With search, however, the entire user experience is built around sending users away. The web is big and imperfect and hard to sift through, so we go to search engines that help us make sense of it and once we find what we want, we move on. In fact, the better a search engine is, the less time we’ll spend with it because the more quickly and easily we’ll find what we’re looking for.

And if the web is dead, then Google is in that much more trouble because we’re just not going to need it as much or as often. After all, search is all about finding content, but if apps are giving us new ways to aggregate content that’s relevant to us, then we’re just not going to rely on search nearly as much as we used to.

Social media, on the other hand is more about creating content and sharing content and interacting through content. And apps can help us do both that, and aggregate (based on our social graph) all the content that lies beyond our immediate social network.

So it’s not even like Google is going to be swallowed up by a new Leviathan. Rather, it’s being picked at, piece by piece, by a swarm of tiny piranhas in the form of apps and the users who use them.

Read More at ReveNews

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 Indira Congress // May 22, 2012 at 12:16 pm

    The net will most likely be considerably a lot more helpful than previously.

Leave a Comment

After many successful years, Marketing Times and the "Top 30 Lists" will be retiring to pave the way for new and exciting projects.

We would like to take this opportunity to Thank You for your continued interest and support throughout the years.

Net Affinity are evolving into a new phase on an exciting journey and hope you will join us by subscribing to the Net Affinity Blog.